Početak›Forumi›Linuks›Linuks magazin›Linux(o) Magazin
- This topic has 27 odgovora, 11 glasova, and was last updated 17 years ranije by tomaja.
-
AutorČlanci
-
27. mart 2007. u 10:34 am #53539foxbunnyUčesnik
Ispraviti neciju netacnu izjavu nije religioznost nego cist razum i pokusaj sprecavanja gluposti.
Tako je, mogao bi otići i na Wikipediju i ispraviti ovaj paragraf:
The term “open source” is attached to a definition originally created in 1998 from the Debian Free Software Guidelines. While most open source software is also free software and vice-versa, [b]this is not always the case[/b].
I dok si tamo, mogao bi da baciš pogled i na ovo (skokni do sajta GNU):
The term “open source” software is used by some people to mean more or less the same category as free software. It is not exactly the same class of software: they accept some licenses that we consider too restrictive, and there are free software licenses they have not accepted. However, the differences in extension of the category are small: nearly all free software is open source, and nearly all open source software is free.
Imaš još jednu šansu pre nego što svi pomisle da si glup.
27. mart 2007. u 10:44 am #53540foxbunnyUčesnik[b]Časopis treba da bude atraktivan i interesantan, batalite filozofiju, religiozni odnos prema free software i slične gluposti!!!![/b]
Ma, naravno, bre. Ova rasprava ovde nema veze sa sadržajem časopisa. Verovatno bi trebalo da se izmesti u novi topic. Ali eto… žar
raspraveprepucavanja veoma niskog nivoa. ::) Evo prestajem, ovog momenta.27. mart 2007. u 10:59 am #53541NightweaverUčesnikErrrm…ovo nije rasprava vec “klin-ploca” prica gde ti strucno izbegavas da ispravis samog sebe…izjava da closed source softver moze biti free tj. slobodan je nesto sto si ti rekao, a ne ja. Ovaj forum na IT ove sceni ove zemlje vazi za mesto jako slabog poznavanja materije (ovo nije moja izjava mada se slazem) ali ovo sto ti pricas je potpuno besmisleno. Prvo kazes da slobodan softver moze biti i onaj zatvorenog koda a onda mi tu navodis neke citate koji nemaju veze sa zivotom…aman!
* The freedom to run the program, for any purpose (freedom 0).
* The freedom to study how the program works, and adapt it to your needs (freedom 1). Access to the source code is a precondition for this.
* The freedom to redistribute copies so you can help your neighbor (freedom 2).
* The freedom to improve the program, and release your improvements to the public, so that the whole community benefits (freedom 3). Access to the source code is a precondition for this.Obrati paznju na pravilo 1 – drugo po redu. Access to the source code is a precondition for this. Po kom to logickom sistemu ti izjavljujes da closed source moze biti free? To sto ti ne razumes sta je receno u toj recenici koju si mi citirao sa GNU sajta je tvoj problem:
nearly all free software is open source, and nearly all open source software is free.
Ne znaci da je skoro sav slobodan softver otvorenog koda ( sav slobodan softver jeste otvorenog koda) vec da skoro sav slobodan softver potpada pod filozofiju Open source pokreta i licenci koje pokret prihvata posto je u prethotnoj recenici receno: “and there are free software licenses they have not accepted”. Ne mesaj babe i zabe.
I ovo sto sam upravo rekao nema nikakve veze da li ja vise volim ovo ili ono, da li sam naklonjen OSI-ju ili GNU-u vec cista rekacija na izjave koje su besmislene same po sebi.
27. mart 2007. u 11:37 am #53542nowaveUčesnikLjudi ovde ocigledno ne mogu da razlikuju slobodan softver od besplatnog. Steta…
27. mart 2007. u 11:51 am #53543miodragzUčesnik@JMateja potpuno si upravu i slazem se s tim jer je to bila i moja ideja sto se tice magazina,ne zelim da ulazim u filozofiju FS jer me ne interesuje.
Imam jednu Veru druga mi ne treba a Linux distribucije svima treba da sluze pa i onima koji hoce Cedegu,NeroLinux.
Nije sve u zivotu Free Software.Sloboda je i mogucnost da koristis na Linux distroima ono sto i nije po definiciji FS sloboda je i da izabres i Windows ako ti odgovara pa i da pises na forumu koji je beznacajan i nestruchan kao ovaj.27. mart 2007. u 12:10 pm #53544NightweaverUčesnikLjudi ovde ocigledno ne mogu da razlikuju slobodan softver od besplatnog. Steta…
Amin!
Tacno. Slobodno ti koristi sta ti je volja..to ti ni ja niti bilo ko ne brani..ja sam licno pobornik BSD licence a ne GPL-a i to je moja sloboda. Ali kad izjavljujete besmislice onda ocekujte reakciju.
27. mart 2007. u 1:30 pm #53545miodragzUčesnik@Nightweaver chitaj ko sta pise ili nauchi da chitas ne pisi napamet
The following licenses have been approved by the OSI.
* Academic Free License
* Adaptive Public License
* Apache Software License
* Apache License, 2.0
* Apple Public Source License
* Artistic license
* Attribution Assurance Licenses
* New BSD license
* Computer Associates Trusted Open Source License 1.1
* Common Development and Distribution License
* Common Public License 1.0
* CUA Office Public License Version 1.0
* EU DataGrid Software License
* Eclipse Public License
* Educational Community License
* Eiffel Forum License
* Eiffel Forum License V2.0
* Entessa Public License
* Fair License
* Frameworx License
* GNU General Public License (GPL)
* GNU Library or “Lesser” General Public License (LGPL)
* Historical Permission Notice and Disclaimer
* IBM Public License
* Intel Open Source License
* Jabber Open Source License
* Lucent Public License (Plan9)
* Lucent Public License Version 1.02
* MIT license
* MITRE Collaborative Virtual Workspace License (CVW License)
* Motosoto License
* Mozilla Public License 1.0 (MPL)
* Mozilla Public License 1.1 (MPL)
* NASA Open Source Agreement 1.3
* Naumen Public License
* Nethack General Public License
* Nokia Open Source License
* OCLC Research Public License 2.0
* Open Group Test Suite License
* Open Software License
* PHP License
* Python license (CNRI Python License)
* Python Software Foundation License
* Qt Public License (QPL)
* RealNetworks Public Source License V1.0
* Reciprocal Public License
* Ricoh Source Code Public License
* Sleepycat License
* Sun Industry Standards Source License (SISSL)
* Sun Public License
* Sybase Open Watcom Public License 1.0
* University of Illinois/NCSA Open Source License
* Vovida Software License v. 1.0
* W3C License
* wxWindows Library License
* X.Net License
* Zope Public License
* zlib/libpng licenseRazlika GNU i OSI
NE VREDJAJ LJUDE BEZVEZE I TO KAD SI DELIMICNO UPRAVU
KAD SE SMEJES SMEJES SE SAM SEBI A NE DRUGIMA27. mart 2007. u 6:00 pm #53546tomajaGlavni majstorHm, neko je od moderatora zakljucao ovu temu sto kako izgleda i nije losa ideja jer je ovde svasta, ali bas svasta nalupano. Ljudi, dajte malo razmisljajte sta pricate, please :-
linux4life
-
AutorČlanci
Moraš biti prijavljen da bi postavio komentar u ovoj temi.